On Sat, 18 May 2024 at 23:10, Vladimir Churyukin wrote:
> I guess the process of passing control from child processes to the parent
> could be a bit tricky for that one, but doable?
> Is there anything I'm missing that can be a no-go for this?
One seriously difficult/possibly impossible thing is
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 11:43 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 22/01/2024 21:58, Vladimir Churyukin wrote:
> > A question about protocol design - would it be possible to extend the
> > protocol, so it can handle multiple startup / authentication messages
> > over a single connection? Are there a
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 11:43 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 22/01/2024 21:58, Vladimir Churyukin wrote:
> > A question about protocol design - would it be possible to extend the
> > protocol, so it can handle multiple startup / authentication messages
> > over a single connection? Are there a
On 22/01/2024 21:58, Vladimir Churyukin wrote:
A question about protocol design - would it be possible to extend the
protocol, so it can handle multiple startup / authentication messages
over a single connection? Are there any serious obstacles? (possible
issues with re-initialization of backen
