Re: Missing TOAST table for pg_class

2020-09-23 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 06:11:06PM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote: > Adding a TOAST can cause circular dependencies between those relations?? If > you don't mind can you explain more about it? The difficult task here is to make sure that we don't have any corner cases that begin to break bec

Re: Missing TOAST table for pg_class

2020-09-23 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:57 PM Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 05:35:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > What exactly do you argue has changed since the previous decision > > that should cause us to change it? In particular, where is the > > additional data to change our minds ab

Re: Missing TOAST table for pg_class

2020-09-22 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 05:35:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > What exactly do you argue has changed since the previous decision > that should cause us to change it? In particular, where is the > additional data to change our minds about the safety of such a thing? Not sure that's safe, as we also w

Re: Missing TOAST table for pg_class

2020-09-22 Thread Tom Lane
=?UTF-8?Q?Fabr=C3=ADzio_de_Royes_Mello?= writes: > Attached patch adds the TOAST to pg_class, and let's open again the > discussion around it. What exactly do you argue has changed since the previous decision that should cause us to change it? In particular, where is the additional data to chang