On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:18 PM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 03:26:24PM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:48 PM Winfield, Steven
> > wrote:
> > > Done - thanks again.
> >
> > This patch looks good to me.
> >
> > I'm going to push this if no objectio
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 03:26:24PM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:48 PM Winfield, Steven
> wrote:
> > Done - thanks again.
>
> This patch looks good to me.
>
> I'm going to push this if no objections.
I marked as committed to make patch checker look healthier.
Tha
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:48 PM Winfield, Steven
wrote:
> Done - thanks again.
This patch looks good to me.
I've rechecked it marks all the functions as parallel safe by
installing an extension and querying the catalog. I've also rechecked
that there is nothing suspicious in these functions in
Done - thanks again.
Steven.
From: Tom Lane
Sent: 18 June 2020 16:28
To: Winfield, Steven
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Mark btree_gist functions as PARALLEL SAFE
"Winfield, Steven" writes:
> On the back of this thread[1]
"Winfield, Steven" writes:
> On the back of this thread[1] over at pgsql-general, I've attached a patch
> that marks the functions in btree_gist as PARALLEL SAFE.
Cool, please add this patch to the commitfest queue to make sure we
don't lose track of it:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/28/
(
