Hi,
On 2019-11-02 23:57:06 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 2 Nov 2019, at 03:21, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2019-11-01 23:19:33 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> >> + * StringInfo provides an extensible string data type. It can be used to
> >>
> >> It might be useful to point out the
> On 2 Nov 2019, at 03:21, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2019-11-01 23:19:33 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> + * StringInfo provides an extensible string data type. It can be used to
>>
>> It might be useful to point out the upper bound on the extensibility in the
>> rewrite of this sentence, an
Hi,
On 2019-11-01 23:19:33 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 30 Oct 2019, at 01:10, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> >Make StringInfo available to frontend code.
>
> I’ve certainly wanted just that on multiple occasions, so +1 on this.
Cool.
> + * StringInfo provides an extensible string da
> On 30 Oct 2019, at 01:10, Andres Freund wrote:
>Make StringInfo available to frontend code.
I’ve certainly wanted just that on multiple occasions, so +1 on this.
>Therefore it seems best to just making StringInfo being usable by
>frontend code. There's not much to do for that, exc
Hello.
At Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:06:38 -0700, Andres Freund wrote in
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-10-30 10:58:59 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > At Tue, 29 Oct 2019 17:10:01 -0700, Andres Freund
> > wrote in
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This patch, in a slightly rougher form, was submitted as part of [1],
>
Hi,
On 2019-10-30 10:58:59 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Tue, 29 Oct 2019 17:10:01 -0700, Andres Freund wrote
> in
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch, in a slightly rougher form, was submitted as part of [1],
> > but it seems worth bringing up separately, rather than just committing
> > hearing
At Tue, 29 Oct 2019 17:10:01 -0700, Andres Freund wrote in
> Hi,
>
> This patch, in a slightly rougher form, was submitted as part of [1],
> but it seems worth bringing up separately, rather than just committing
> hearing no objections.
..
> I'm still using stringinfo in the aforementioned threa
