Dean Rasheed 于2025年5月28日周三 18:26写道：
> On Mon, 26 May 2025 at 12:50, Tender Wang wrote:
> >
> >> > "it is possible for the parent to be excluded from the
> >> > plan and so all of the entries in the resultRelInfo array may be for
> >> > different relations than rootResultRelInfo."
> >> >
> >> >
On Mon, 26 May 2025 at 12:50, Tender Wang wrote:
>
>> > "it is possible for the parent to be excluded from the
>> > plan and so all of the entries in the resultRelInfo array may be for
>> > different relations than rootResultRelInfo."
>> >
>> > I didn't fully understand the above sentence. Can y
Dean Rasheed 于2025年5月26日周一 18:41写道：
> On Mon, 26 May 2025 at 07:46, Tender Wang wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dean,
> >
> > "it is possible for the parent to be excluded from the
> > plan and so all of the entries in the resultRelInfo array may be for
> > different relations than rootResultRelInfo."
> >
>
On Mon, 26 May 2025 at 10:39, Tender Wang wrote:
>
> jian he 于2025年5月26日周一 17:30写道：
>>
>> + Relation rootRelation = rootRelInfo->ri_RelationDesc;
>> + Relation firstResultRel = mtstate->resultRelInfo[0].ri_RelationDesc;
>> + int firstVarno = mtstate->resultRelInfo[0].ri_RangeTableIndex;
>>
>> fir
On Mon, 26 May 2025 at 07:46, Tender Wang wrote:
>
> Hi Dean,
>
> "it is possible for the parent to be excluded from the
> plan and so all of the entries in the resultRelInfo array may be for
> different relations than rootResultRelInfo."
>
> I didn't fully understand the above sentence. Can you
On Mon, 26 May 2025 at 10:30, jian he wrote:
>
> + Relation rootRelation = rootRelInfo->ri_RelationDesc;
> + Relation firstResultRel = mtstate->resultRelInfo[0].ri_RelationDesc;
> + int firstVarno = mtstate->resultRelInfo[0].ri_RangeTableIndex;
>
> firstResultRel may equal (==) to rootRelation,
>
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 4:11 AM Dean Rasheed wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 May 2025 at 13:41, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> >
>
> 2. ExecInitModifyTable() does not initialize the WCO lists or
> RETURNING list for rootResultRelInfo, so those never get executed.
>
> As it happens, it is possible to construct cases
jian he 于2025年5月26日周一 17:30写道：
> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 4:11 AM Dean Rasheed
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 25 May 2025 at 13:41, Dean Rasheed
> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > 2. ExecInitModifyTable() does not initialize the WCO lists or
> > RETURNING list for rootResultRelInfo, so those never get executed.
>
Dean Rasheed 于2025年5月26日周一 04:10写道：
> On Sun, 25 May 2025 at 13:41, Dean Rasheed
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 25 May 2025 at 13:06, Tender Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > For a partitioned table, we must pass rootResultRelInfo to
> ExecInsert(). I added the check before calling ExecInsert()
> > > If it is
Dean Rasheed 于2025年5月26日周一 04:10写道：
> On Sun, 25 May 2025 at 13:41, Dean Rasheed
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 25 May 2025 at 13:06, Tender Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > For a partitioned table, we must pass rootResultRelInfo to
> ExecInsert(). I added the check before calling ExecInsert()
> > > If it is
On Sun, 25 May 2025 at 13:41, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 May 2025 at 13:06, Tender Wang wrote:
> >
> > For a partitioned table, we must pass rootResultRelInfo to ExecInsert(). I
> > added the check before calling ExecInsert()
> > If it is a partitioned table, we continue to pass rootResu
On Sun, 25 May 2025 at 13:06, Tender Wang wrote:
>
> For a partitioned table, we must pass rootResultRelInfo to ExecInsert(). I
> added the check before calling ExecInsert()
> If it is a partitioned table, we continue to pass rootResultRelInfo.
> Otherwise, we pass resultRelInfo.
> Please see th
Tender Wang 于2025年5月25日周日 19:17写道：
>
>
> Álvaro Herrera 于2025年5月24日周六 17:11写道：
>
>> On 2025-May-21, Andres Freund wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > In [1] I added some verification to projection building, to check if the
>> > tupleslot passed to ExecBuildProjectionInfo() is compatible with the
>> tar
Álvaro Herrera 于2025年5月24日周六 17:11写道：
> On 2025-May-21, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > In [1] I added some verification to projection building, to check if the
> > tupleslot passed to ExecBuildProjectionInfo() is compatible with the
> target
> > list. One query in merge.sql [2] got flagg
On 2025-May-21, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In [1] I added some verification to projection building, to check if the
> tupleslot passed to ExecBuildProjectionInfo() is compatible with the target
> list. One query in merge.sql [2] got flagged.
>
> Trying to debug that issue, I found another p
15 matches
Mail list logo
