On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 03:03, Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote:
>
> A user can start physical replication without needing CONNECT on any
> database if it has REPLICATION attribute. That means any user that
> is allowed logical replication on a specific database (or even no
> databases) can replicate the w
Stephen Frost writes:
> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> ISTM those statements are contradictory. The two privileges could
>> only be called orthogonal if it's possible to make use of one without
>> having the other. As things stand, REPLICATION without LOGIN is an
>> entirely useless s
Greetings,
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
> > Not to make the life of everybody more complicated here, but I don't
> > agree. LOGIN and REPLICATION are in my opinion completely orthogonal
> > and it sounds more natural IMO that a REPLICATION user should be able
Michael Paquier writes:
> Not to make the life of everybody more complicated here, but I don't
> agree. LOGIN and REPLICATION are in my opinion completely orthogonal
> and it sounds more natural IMO that a REPLICATION user should be able
> to log into the server only if it has LOGIN defined.
IST
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 03:03:26PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Fri, 8 May 2020 01:02:11 -0400, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote in
>> On 2020-May-07, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> FWIW, I would argue that LOGIN permits logging in on a regular SQL
>>> connection, while REPLICATION should permit logging in o
At Fri, 8 May 2020 01:02:11 -0400, Alvaro Herrera
wrote in
> On 2020-May-07, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I would argue that LOGIN permits logging in on a regular SQL
> > connection, while REPLICATION should permit logging in on a
> > replication connection, and there's no reason for either to d
On 2020-May-07, Tom Lane wrote:
> FWIW, I would argue that LOGIN permits logging in on a regular SQL
> connection, while REPLICATION should permit logging in on a
> replication connection, and there's no reason for either to depend on
> or require the other.
I agree with this.
> >> Also- what ab
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> I'd welcome input from other people on this issue; only now I noticed
> that it's buried in pgsql-docs, so CCing pgsql-hackers now.
FWIW, I would argue that LOGIN permits logging in on a regular SQL
connection, while REPLICATION should permit logging in on a
replication c
I'd welcome input from other people on this issue; only now I noticed
that it's buried in pgsql-docs, so CCing pgsql-hackers now.
On 2020-Apr-23, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > > I had it in my mind that LOGIN was for
