On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 02:28:50PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I pushed some fixes produced here. Attached is the remainder of the
>> patch you submitted. I notice now that we haven't actually fixed
>> Peter's source of complaint, thou
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 02:28:50PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I pushed some fixes produced here. Attached is the remainder of the
> patch you submitted. I notice now that we haven't actually fixed
> Peter's source of complaint, though. AFAICS your patch just adds test
> cases, and upthread d
Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 01:38:22PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > Perhaps, I'm just repeating what's already been said, but I think it might
> > be better to have the word "partitioned" in the message.
>
> That's what Peter is pointing to upthread and what the v1 of upthre
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 01:38:22PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Perhaps, I'm just repeating what's already been said, but I think it might
> be better to have the word "partitioned" in the message.
That's what Peter is pointing to upthread and what the v1 of upthread
was doing. I would tend to th
On 2018/05/02 13:38, Amit Langote wrote:
> --- a/contrib/amcheck/expected/check_btree.out
> +++ b/contrib/amcheck/expected/check_btree.out
>
> +-- verify partitioned tables are rejected (error)
> +SELECT bt_index_check('bttest_partitioned');
> +ERROR: "bttest_partitioned" is not an index
>
> Per
Hi.
On 2018/05/02 11:05, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 12:30:44PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> However, backing up a minute, I don't think "relation \"%s\" is not a
>> btree index" is such a terrible message. These modules are intended
>> to be intended by people who Know What
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 12:30:44PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> That's probably going to cause some translation problems. The form of
> "a" that you need will vary: "a" vs. "an" in English, "un" vs. "una"
> in Spanish, etc. And it wouldn't be surprising if there are problems
> in some languages ev
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:50 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 06:20:02PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> What about amcheck? I did change the example query in the docs to
>> account for this, so anyone that generalizes from that won't have a
>> problem, but it would be nice if
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 06:20:02PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> What about amcheck? I did change the example query in the docs to
> account for this, so anyone that generalizes from that won't have a
> problem, but it would be nice if it had a friendlier message. I didn't
> change amcheck to acc
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hm, the docs about taking backups with the low-level APIs don't care
> much about relkind now:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-LOWLEVEL-BASE-BACKUP
> Or do you have another section in the docs
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 05:29:59PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> It looks like local partitioned indexes are a problem for pageinspect:
>
> pg@regression[28736]=# select bt_metap('at_partitioned_b_idx');
> ERROR: relation "at_partitioned_b_idx" is not a btree index
Okay, I can see the point yo
11 matches
Mail list logo
