On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 04:36:44PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 01:20:46PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2023-11-17 15:39:14 -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> >
> > I think the connection between freezing and removal of commit timestamps is
> > a
> > lot less direct that
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 01:20:46PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-11-17 15:39:14 -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023, at 9:47 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Is this documentation change still relevant?
> >
> > I think so. AFAICS nothing changed. Unless you read the
Hi,
On 2023-11-17 15:39:14 -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023, at 9:47 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Is this documentation change still relevant?
>
> I think so. AFAICS nothing changed. Unless you read the source code, it is not
> clear that VACUUM removes the information for froze
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 03:39:14PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023, at 9:47 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Is this documentation change still relevant?
>
>
> I think so. AFAICS nothing changed. Unless you read the source code, it is not
> clear that VACUUM removes the inform
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023, at 9:47 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Is this documentation change still relevant?
I think so. AFAICS nothing changed. Unless you read the source code, it is not
clear that VACUUM removes the information for frozen tuples. They are decoupled
(but executed in the same routine for
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 05:21:32PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I don't find any description in the documentation about the
> guaranteed lifetime of commit timestamps. I think they are
> preserved until corresponding xid goes beyond the freeze horizen,
> even though they are actual
