Re: Licence preamble update

2025-03-01 Thread Amit Kapila
On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 9:20 AM Noah Misch wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 12:07:26PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > PGCAC holds trademarks on both "PostgreSQL" and "Postgres". We've > > been given legal advice that both terms need to be in current use > > to preserve the trademarks. Which the

Re: Licence preamble update

2025-02-28 Thread Noah Misch
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 12:07:26PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Noah Misch writes: > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 04:56:05PM +, Dave Page wrote: > >> --- a/COPYRIGHT > >> +++ b/COPYRIGHT > >> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > >> PostgreSQL Database Management System > >> -(formerly known as Postgres, then as Postgre

Re: Licence preamble update

2025-02-28 Thread Tom Lane
Noah Misch writes: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 04:56:05PM +, Dave Page wrote: >> --- a/COPYRIGHT >> +++ b/COPYRIGHT >> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ >> PostgreSQL Database Management System >> -(formerly known as Postgres, then as Postgres95) >> +(also known as Postgres, formerly as Postgres95) >> >> Portion

Re: Licence preamble update

2025-02-27 Thread Noah Misch
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 04:56:05PM +, Dave Page wrote: > Per some brief discussion on the core list, the attached patch updates the > licence preamble to more accurately reflect the use of Postgres vs. > PostgreSQL (see https://www.postgresql.org/about/policies/project-name/ for > background fr