On 11/24/19 11:04 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Mark Dilger writes:
On 11/24/19 10:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
After sleeping on it, I'm not really happy with what I did in
PrepareTransaction (that is, invent a separate PrePrepare_Notify
function). The idea was to keep that looking parallel to what
Commi
Mark Dilger writes:
> On 11/24/19 10:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> After sleeping on it, I'm not really happy with what I did in
>> PrepareTransaction (that is, invent a separate PrePrepare_Notify
>> function). The idea was to keep that looking parallel to what
>> CommitTransaction does, and preserve
On 11/24/19 10:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Mark Dilger writes:
On 11/23/19 8:50 PM, Mark Dilger wrote:
I have finished reading and applying your three patches and have moved
on to testing them. I hope to finish the review soon.
After applying all three patches, the stress test that originall
Mark Dilger writes:
> On 11/23/19 8:50 PM, Mark Dilger wrote:
>> I have finished reading and applying your three patches and have moved
>> on to testing them. I hope to finish the review soon.
> After applying all three patches, the stress test that originally
> uncovered the assert in predicat
On 11/23/19 8:50 PM, Mark Dilger wrote:
On 11/23/19 5:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I ran into a couple of issues while trying to devise a regression test
illustrating the LISTEN-in-serializable-transaction issue Mark Dilger
reported. The first one is that an isolation test in which we expect
to
Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 at 02:01, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This seems both undesirable for our own testing, and rather bogus
>> from users' standpoints as well. However, I think a simple fix is
>> available: just make the SQL pg_notification_queue_usage() function
>> advan
Hoi Tom,
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 at 02:01, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> This seems both undesirable for our own testing, and rather bogus
> from users' standpoints as well. However, I think a simple fix is
> available: just make the SQL pg_notification_queue_usage() function
> advance the queue tail before m
On 11/23/19 5:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I ran into a couple of issues while trying to devise a regression test
illustrating the LISTEN-in-serializable-transaction issue Mark Dilger
reported. The first one is that an isolation test in which we expect
to see a cross-process NOTIFY immediately afte
