> "Tom" == Tom Lane writes:
>> Is there some reason why ld_library_path_var is defined using a
>> bunch of $(if) constructs rather than putting the value (if not
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH) in the individual port makefiles?
Tom> I might be wrong, but I think that code is Peter's. I agree that
Andrew Gierth writes:
> Is there some reason why ld_library_path_var is defined using a bunch of
> $(if) constructs rather than putting the value (if not LD_LIBRARY_PATH)
> in the individual port makefiles?
I might be wrong, but I think that code is Peter's. I agree that
having the per-port make
> "Tom" == Tom Lane writes:
>> At least on my FreeBSD 11 box, the current definition of
>> $(with_temp_install) is not sufficient to ensure that the various .so
>> files are loaded from tmp_install and not from the compiled rpath (which
>> will be the final install dir, which may of cours
> "Tom" == Tom Lane writes:
>> At least on my FreeBSD 11 box, the current definition of
>> $(with_temp_install) is not sufficient to ensure that the various
>> .so files are loaded from tmp_install and not from the compiled
>> rpath (which will be the final install dir, which may of cours
Andrew Gierth writes:
> At least on my FreeBSD 11 box, the current definition of
> $(with_temp_install) is not sufficient to ensure that the various .so
> files are loaded from tmp_install and not from the compiled rpath (which
> will be the final install dir, which may of course contain old
> lib
