Paul Jungwirth writes:
> Here are new patches using a new SupportRequestInlineSRF request type. They
> include patches and
> documentation.
I took a look through this. I feel like we're still some way away
from having something committable. I've got two main complaint
areas:
1. It doesn't se
On 7/26/24 11:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas writes:
>> On 28/06/2024 01:01, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
>>> Another approach I considered is using a separate support request, e.g.
SupportRequestInlineSRF, and
>>> just calling it from inline_set_returning_function. I didn't like having
two
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> On 28/06/2024 01:01, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
>> Another approach I considered is using a separate support request, e.g.
>> SupportRequestInlineSRF, and
>> just calling it from inline_set_returning_function. I didn't like having two
>> support requests that
>> did almos
On 28/06/2024 01:01, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
If it seems good to let people use SupportRequestSimplify to make their SRFs be
inlineable, I'm
happy to add tests and docs. We should really document the idea of inlined
functions in general, so
I'll do that too.
Another approach I considered is usin
