On Feb 11, 2025 at 07:52 +0800, Sami Imseih , wrote:
>
> IMO, the correct approach is to disallow the STORAGE parameter on
> foreign tables,
> which is what [1] tried to avoid for some reason. However, since this
> behavior has
> existed for over 10 years, I don’t think we should change it.
Hi,
I
> This form sets the storage mode for a column. See the similar form of ALTER
> TABLE for more details.
> Note that the storage mode has no effect unless the table's foreign-data
> wrapper chooses to pay attention to it.
Hi,
It looks like cb1ca4d [1], from nearly 10 years ago, allowed storage
o
