On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 at 08:44, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Thanks. Those changes seem fine to me to.
Thanks for checking.
> Do you intend to push these, or do you want me to do it?
I made a few tweaks to the comments and pushed.
David
On 4/14/25 04:09, David Rowley wrote:
> I noticed a while ago that the new fast-path locking code uses integer
> division to figure out the fast-path locking group slot. To me, this
> seems a bit unnecessary as FastPathLockGroupsPerBackend is always a
> power-of-two value, so we can use bitwise-A
