On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 3:29 AM Dean Rasheed wrote:
> I agree that additional testing in this area is valuable. Patch 0001
> looks reasonable to me, on a quick read-through. In patch 0002, I
> think it would be valuable to also test updating the parent row to
> time periods consistent and not cons
On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 at 23:22, Paul Jungwirth
wrote:
>
> On 7/11/25 11:50, Rustam ALLAKOV wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> > Thanks for this patch!
> > Lilian and I have reviewed your patches.
>
> Thank you for the review! I've attached new patches addressing your feedback.
>
I agree that additional testing
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: tested, passed
Documentation:tested, passed
Hi Paul,
Thank you for your prompt reply.
> I have the same
On 7/11/25 11:50, Rustam ALLAKOV wrote:
Hi Paul,
Thanks for this patch!
Lilian and I have reviewed your patches.
Thank you for the review! I've attached new patches addressing your feedback.
All patches apply and all tests are passing.
Since you are adding tests, we expected to see some impro
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: tested, passed
Documentation:tested, passed
Hi Paul,
Thanks for this patch!
Lilian and I have reviewed yo