Re: Foreign key isolation tests

2025-07-18 Thread Paul A Jungwirth
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 3:29 AM Dean Rasheed wrote: > I agree that additional testing in this area is valuable. Patch 0001 > looks reasonable to me, on a quick read-through. In patch 0002, I > think it would be valuable to also test updating the parent row to > time periods consistent and not cons

Re: Foreign key isolation tests

2025-07-18 Thread Dean Rasheed
On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 at 23:22, Paul Jungwirth wrote: > > On 7/11/25 11:50, Rustam ALLAKOV wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > Thanks for this patch! > > Lilian and I have reviewed your patches. > > Thank you for the review! I've attached new patches addressing your feedback. > I agree that additional testing

Re: Foreign key isolation tests

2025-07-14 Thread Rustam ALLAKOV
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: make installcheck-world: tested, passed Implements feature: tested, passed Spec compliant: tested, passed Documentation:tested, passed Hi Paul, Thank you for your prompt reply. > I have the same

Re: Foreign key isolation tests

2025-07-11 Thread Paul Jungwirth
On 7/11/25 11:50, Rustam ALLAKOV wrote: Hi Paul, Thanks for this patch! Lilian and I have reviewed your patches. Thank you for the review! I've attached new patches addressing your feedback. All patches apply and all tests are passing. Since you are adding tests, we expected to see some impro

Re: Foreign key isolation tests

2025-07-11 Thread Rustam ALLAKOV
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: make installcheck-world: tested, passed Implements feature: tested, passed Spec compliant: tested, passed Documentation:tested, passed Hi Paul, Thanks for this patch! Lilian and I have reviewed yo