On 02/04/2021 20:21, John Naylor wrote:
I have nothing further so it's RFC. The patch is pretty simple compared
to the earlier ones, but is worth running the fuzzer again as added
insurance?
Good idea. I did that, and indeed it revealed bugs. If the client sent
just a single byte in one CopyD
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 4:47 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Ok, I wouldn't expect to see much difference in that test, it gets
> drowned in all the other parsing overhead. I tested this now with this:
>
> copy (select repeat('x', 1) from generate_series(1, 10)) to
> '/tmp/copydata-x.txt'
>
On 18/03/2021 17:09, John Naylor wrote:
The cfbot thinks this patch no longer applies, but it works for me, so
still set to RFC. It looks like it's because the thread to remove the v2
FE/BE protocol was still attached to the commitfest entry. I've deleted
that, so let's see if that helps.
It
The cfbot thinks this patch no longer applies, but it works for me, so
still set to RFC. It looks like it's because the thread to remove the v2
FE/BE protocol was still attached to the commitfest entry. I've deleted
that, so let's see if that helps.
To answer the side question of whether it makes
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 5:13 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> I posted this earlier at
>
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9ec25819-0a8a-d51a-17dc-4150bb3cc...@iki.fi
,
> and that led to removing FE/BE protocol version 2 support. That's been
> committed now, so here's COPY FROM patch again, reb