Thank you! I had completely forgotten about this, I appreciate that you dug
this one out of the archives!
> Existing spellcheckers for code usually have quite high rates of false
> positives, so any automated tooling would have to avoid that to not
become a
> burden rather than a help. Personally
> On 3 Mar 2025, at 01:39, Jacob Brazeal wrote:
>
> This patch fixes various typos I've found, most of them from recent commits.
Thanks, I've applied the fixes for typos introduced during the v18 cycle. I
did leave a few out from your patch though:
> - Because not all statistics are not tr
