Tom Lane writes:
> OK, got that. But that doesn't directly answer the question of whether
> it's wrong to use a phony target as an order-only prerequisite of
> another phony target. Grepping around for other possible issues,
> I see that you recently added
>
> update-unicode: | submake-generate
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 2020-01-09 15:17, Tom Lane wrote:
>> 1) Changing from an "|"-style dependency to a plain dependency seems
>> like a semantics change. I've never been totally clear on the
>> difference though. I think Peter introduced our use of the "|" style,
>> so maybe he can com
On 2020-01-09 15:17, Tom Lane wrote:
1) Changing from an "|"-style dependency to a plain dependency seems
like a semantics change. I've never been totally clear on the
difference though. I think Peter introduced our use of the "|" style,
so maybe he can comment.
If you have a phony target as
Tom Lane writes:
> My thoughts about the patch:
>
> 1) Changing from an "|"-style dependency to a plain dependency seems
> like a semantics change. I've never been totally clear on the
> difference though. I think Peter introduced our use of the "|" style,
> so maybe he can comment.
Makefile.s
ilm...@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?=) writes:
> Michael Paquier writes:
>> Hmm. That logically makes sense. Isn't that a side effect of 7143b3e
>> then? Now, FWIW, I am not able to reproduce it here, after trying on
>> two different machines, various parallel job numbers
On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 01:33:13PM +, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> I noticed to my annoyance that 'make -j4 -C src/interfaces/libpq'
> doesn't work in a clean checkout, because it can't find
> libpgcommon_shlib and libpgport_shlib. It looks like that's because the
> submake-libpgport depe
