Re: Fixes required for cross version update testing

2023-01-13 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 2023-01-13 Fr 19:33, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 05:20:41PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> Over at [1] there was some discussion of moving knowledge of what's >> required to be fixed from old branch repos to be able to upgrade them >> into the core code, instead of having i

Re: Fixes required for cross version update testing

2023-01-13 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 2023-01-13 Fr 19:49, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan writes: >> Here's a piece of WIP for that, in the form of a perl module that >> provides a function that takes an old version number / tag and provides >> the set of sql statements that need to be run to make the old repo >> upgradeable. I

Re: Fixes required for cross version update testing

2023-01-13 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan writes: > Here's a piece of WIP for that, in the form of a perl module that > provides a function that takes an old version number / tag and provides > the set of sql statements that need to be run to make the old repo > upgradeable. It still needs a good deal of polish, but it's a

Re: Fixes required for cross version update testing

2023-01-13 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 05:20:41PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Over at [1] there was some discussion of moving knowledge of what's > required to be fixed from old branch repos to be able to upgrade them > into the core code, instead of having it reside in a buildfarm client > module. Is this in