On 25.03.22 11:49, Pavel Borisov wrote:
It's true that offset can not be negative, but printing int value as %u
isn't nice even if it is not supposed to be negative. So I'd propose the
small patch in this thread be applied separately if none has anything
against it.
committed
пн, 21 мар. 2022 г. в 16:11, Pavel Borisov :
> Afaics offset etc can't be negative, so I don't think this really improves
>> matters. I think there's quite a few other places where we use %u to print
>> integers that we know aren't negative.
>>
>> If anything I think we should change the signed in
>
> Afaics offset etc can't be negative, so I don't think this really improves
> matters. I think there's quite a few other places where we use %u to print
> integers that we know aren't negative.
>
> If anything I think we should change the signed integers to unsigned ones.
> It
> might be worth d
Hi,
On 2022-03-18 22:52:02 +0400, Pavel Borisov wrote:
> I've noticed that in SRLU error reporting both signed and unsigned values
> are output as %u. I think it is worth correcting this with the very simple
> patch attached.
Afaics offset etc can't be negative, so I don't think this really impro
