On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 7:11 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> On 2018-Jun-26, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
>> Andrew, Alvaro, do you think we can go ahead with above naming
>> suggestions or do we want to brainstorm more on it?
>
> Looks good to me in a quick skim.
>
Thanks, pushed!
--
With Regards,
Amit Ka
On 2018-Jun-26, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Andrew, Alvaro, do you think we can go ahead with above naming
> suggestions or do we want to brainstorm more on it?
Looks good to me in a quick skim.
--
Álvaro Herrerahttps://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 12:54 AM, Andrew Dunstan
> wrote:
>>
>> On 06/14/2018 02:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>>
>>> We used to use prefixes for common struct members names to help
>>> disambiguate across members that would otherwise have ide
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 12:54 AM, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
>
> On 06/14/2018 02:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>> On 2018-Jun-14, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 5:08 AM, Amit Kapila
>>> wrote:
2.
+/*
+ * Structure used to represent value to be used when the att
Somehow I missed this thread ...
On 06/14/2018 02:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On 2018-Jun-14, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 5:08 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
2.
+/*
+ * Structure used to represent value to be used when the attribute is not
+ * present at all in a tuple, i.e. when
On 2018-Jun-14, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 5:08 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > 2.
> > +/*
> > + * Structure used to represent value to be used when the attribute is not
> > + * present at all in a tuple, i.e. when the column was created after the
> > tuple
> > + */
> > +
> > +typede
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 5:08 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Some assorted comments:
>
> 2.
> +/*
> + * Structure used to represent value to be used when the attribute is not
> + * present at all in a tuple, i.e. when the column was created after the
> tuple
> + */
> +
> +typedef struct attrMissing
> +{
>
