> On 5 Feb 2025, at 18:28, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>> On 5 Feb 2025, at 18:24, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>> Anyway, at least the bytes appear to be interpreted the same by both
>> openssl and this new function, so that's good news.
>
> Thanks for confirming. Short of a very small doc change
On 2025-Jan-29, Umar Hayat wrote:
> Hi Daniel Gustafsson and Vladyslav Nebozhyn,
> I created a patch for CFB mode for AES encryption. Please have a look
> and let me know what you think.
> Patch covers implementation, tests and documentation changes.
>
> OpenSSL profives aes-cfb1, aes-cfb8 and ae
> On 5 Feb 2025, at 18:24, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> Anyway, at least the bytes appear to be interpreted the same by both
> openssl and this new function, so that's good news.
Thanks for confirming. Short of a very small doc change (which I don't have
handy on this laptop) I think this patch is r
Hi Vladyslav,
No Problem, I also did not realize that you will be implementing it.
So I spent a couple of hours and provided a patch.
Also created commitfest entry as well, Please do review the patch and
let me know if this is sufficient at least for your use case.
Regards,
Umar Hayat
Bitnine (htt
Dear Umar,
I sincerely apologize for missing your email earlier. I truly
appreciate the time and effort you put into creating the patch—it
looks great! Thank you for your work on this and for contributing to
the solution so quickly.
I’m really glad to see this enhancement being added to pgcrypto,
Dear Daniel Gustafsson,
Thank you for your response and for offering to review the patch. I
really appreciate your time and willingness to assist with this!
I've prepared a patch to add AES-CFB support to pgcrypto, following
the existing structure used for other AES modes. Integrating it for
AES
Hi Daniel Gustafsson and Vladyslav Nebozhyn,
I created a patch for CFB mode for AES encryption. Please have a look
and let me know what you think.
Patch covers implementation, tests and documentation changes.
OpenSSL profives aes-cfb1, aes-cfb8 and aes-cfb128 modes where aes-cfb
defaults to aes-cf
> On 28 Jan 2025, at 11:46, Vladyslav Nebozhyn wrote:
> • Ease of Implementation: OpenSSL already provides a straightforward API
> for AES-128-CFB, so adding it to pgcrypto should require only a few lines of
> code.
IIRC we already support CFB for Blowfish so I think it would be quite easy
