On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:58 PM Nicola Contu wrote:
> So that seems to be a bug, correct?
> Just to confirm, I am not using NFS, it is directly on disk.
>
> Other than that, is there a particular option we can set in the postgres.conf
> to mitigate the issue?
Hi Nicola,
Yeah, I think it's a bug.
The only change we made on the disk, is the encryption at OS level.
Not sure this can be something related.
Il giorno mar 7 apr 2020 alle ore 10:58 Nicola Contu
ha scritto:
> So that seems to be a bug, correct?
> Just to confirm, I am not using NFS, it is directly on disk.
>
> Other than that, i
So that seems to be a bug, correct?
Just to confirm, I am not using NFS, it is directly on disk.
Other than that, is there a particular option we can set in the
postgres.conf to mitigate the issue?
Thanks a lot for your help.
Il giorno sab 4 apr 2020 alle ore 02:49 Thomas Munro
ha scritto:
>
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 9:25 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote:
> I provided the subject, and added -hackers.
>
> > Hello,
> > I am running postgres 11.5 and we were having issues with shared segments.
> > So I increased the max_connection as suggested by you guys and reduced my
> > work_mem to 600M.
> >
