Re: Document use of ldapurl with LDAP simple bind

2024-07-23 Thread Jacob Champion
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 1:37 AM Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Committed. Thanks! > (I suppose this could be considered a bug fix, but I don't feel an > urgency to go backpatching this. Let me know if there are different > opinions.) Certainly no urgency. The docs part of the patch also could be ba

Re: Document use of ldapurl with LDAP simple bind

2024-07-23 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 08.07.24 23:27, Jacob Champion wrote: On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 12:11 AM Peter Eisentraut wrote: This appears to imply that specifying ldapurl is only applicable for search+bind. Maybe that whole message should be simplified to something like "configuration mixes arguments for simple bind an

Re: Document use of ldapurl with LDAP simple bind

2024-07-08 Thread Jacob Champion
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 12:11 AM Peter Eisentraut wrote: > This appears to imply that specifying ldapurl is only applicable for > search+bind. Maybe that whole message should be simplified to something > like > > "configuration mixes arguments for simple bind and search+bind" > > (The old wording

Re: Document use of ldapurl with LDAP simple bind

2024-06-28 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 24.05.24 20:54, Jacob Champion wrote: Our documentation implies that the ldapurl setting in pg_hba is used for search+bind mode only. It was pointed out to me recently that this is not true, and if you're dealing with simple bind on a non-standard scheme or port, then ldapurl makes the HBA eas