Re: Docs for pg_basebackup needs v17 note for incremental backup

> On 27 Feb 2025, at 19:06, David G. Johnston > wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 2:46 PM Daniel Gustafsson > wrote: >> I'd be happy to help getting this in, do you have a suggested wording? > > Thank you. > > Attached. Patch LGTM so I've applied it. -- Daniel Gusta

Re: Docs for pg_basebackup needs v17 note for incremental backup

On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 2:46 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > I'd be happy to help getting this in, do you have a suggested wording? > > Thank you. Attached. David J. From fc9768fa1de17529cddc3f3ac1fba208f7500083 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "David G. Johnston" Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 10:58:57 -0

Re: Docs for pg_basebackup needs v17 note for incremental backup

On 2025-Jan-13, David G. Johnston wrote: > Hackers, > > Should the following paragraph in the docs be modified to point out minimum > server version of v17 for incremental backups? > > pg_basebackup works with servers of the same or an older major version, > down to 9.1. However, WAL streaming mo

Re: Docs for pg_basebackup needs v17 note for incremental backup

> On 6 Feb 2025, at 15:43, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Thursday, February 6, 2025, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > People get busy. For example, many prominent hackers spent most of the last > > week at various conferences. There are also > > other things happening less > > publicly that are claim

Re: Docs for pg_basebackup needs v17 note for incremental backup

On Thursday, February 6, 2025, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > On 2025-02-05 We 7:59 PM, David G. Johnston wrote > > > People get busy. For example, many prominent hackers spent most of the > last week at various conferences. There are also other things happening > less publicly that are claiming people'

Re: Docs for pg_basebackup needs v17 note for incremental backup

On 2025-02-05 We 7:59 PM, David G. Johnston wrote: Is there seriously not a single person in the past three weeks who has seen this and not had the minute to spare to say "yes, this should be documented"? David J. On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 8:13 PM David G. Johnston wrote: Hackers,

Re: Docs for pg_basebackup needs v17 note for incremental backup

Is there seriously not a single person in the past three weeks who has seen this and not had the minute to spare to say "yes, this should be documented"? David J. On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 8:13 PM David G. Johnston < david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hackers, > > Should the following paragraph