> The requirement for ownership of at least one type means that the
> example you give could only be done by a superuser.
That's correct; and superuser should be doing the right thing.
> There is currently no way to prevent the usage of a user-defined cast. Should
> there be one?
>> I don't
Sami Imseih writes:
> When a user-defined CAST is created, it has the ability to break behavior of
> built-in
> casts that could be performed implicitly, i.e. without a cast defined in
> pg_cast.
The requirement for ownership of at least one type means that the
example you give could only be do
