On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 at 13:07, Kirill Panin wrote:
>
> Thanks for your response.
> Do you think it makes sense to disallow cube+cube operations and only
> allow cube+point or point+point instead? Dot and cross products would be
> similarly only defined for point+point if someone were to implement th
Hi,
Thanks for your response.
Do you think it makes sense to disallow cube+cube operations and only
allow cube+point or point+point instead? Dot and cross products would be
similarly only defined for point+point if someone were to implement them.
I'll submit a v2 if this is an acceptable solut
On Thu, 15 May 2025 at 16:16, Kirill Panin wrote:
>
> Hi hackers!
>
> The "cube" extention is frequently used for vectors, but the current
> implementation lacks support for binary operators, such as +, -, *, /.
> The attached (fairly trivial) patch adds support for these with the
> required docum
