Hi,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 9:23 AM Amit Langote wrote:
>
> Hi Daniil,
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:32 PM Daniil Davydov <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > As far as I understand, this work partially overlaps with what we did in the
> > thread [1] (in short - we introduce support
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 10:40 PM Amit Langote wrote:
> That would be nice to see if you have the time, but maybe after I post
> a new version.
I’ve created a CF entry marked WoA for this in the next CF under the
title “Batching in executor, part 1: add batch variant of table AM
scan API.” The ide
Hi Daniil,
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:32 PM Daniil Davydov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As far as I understand, this work partially overlaps with what we did in the
> thread [1] (in short - we introduce support for batching within the
> ModifyTable
> node). Am I correct?
There might
Hi,
As far as I understand, this work partially overlaps with what we did in the
thread [1] (in short - we introduce support for batching within the ModifyTable
node). Am I correct?
It's worth saying that the patch in that thread is already quite old -
now I have
an improved implementation and te
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 1:18 AM Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 10/27/25 08:24, Amit Langote wrote:
> > Thank you for reviewing the patch and taking the time to run those
> > experiments. I appreciate the detailed feedback and questions. I also
> > apologize for my late reply, I spent perhaps way too mu
Hi Peter,
Thanks for chiming in here.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 2:37 AM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 7:01 AM Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > While looking at the patch, I couldn't help but think about the index
> > prefetching stuff that I work on. It also introduces the concept of
On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 7:01 AM Tomas Vondra wrote:
> While looking at the patch, I couldn't help but think about the index
> prefetching stuff that I work on. It also introduces the concept of a
> "batch", for passing data between an index AM and the executor. It's
> interesting how different the
On 10/27/25 08:24, Amit Langote wrote:
> Hi Tomas,
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 8:01 PM Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>
>> Hi Amit,
>>
>> Thanks for the patch. I took a look over the weekend, and done a couple
>> experiments / benchmarks, so let me share some initial feedback (or
>> rather a bunch of quest
Hi Tomas,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 8:01 PM Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> Thanks for the patch. I took a look over the weekend, and done a couple
> experiments / benchmarks, so let me share some initial feedback (or
> rather a bunch of questions I came up with).
Thank you for reviewing the
Hi Bruce,
On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 10:49 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 10:28:33PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > At PGConf.dev this year we had an unconference session [1] on whether
> > the community can support an additional batch executor. The discussion
> > there led me to
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 11:11 AM Amit Langote wrote:
> Hi Tomas,
>
> Thanks a lot for your comments and benchmarking.
>
> I plan to reply to your detailed comments and benchmark results
For now, I reran a few benchmarks with the master branch as an
explicit baseline, since Tomas reported possible
On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 10:28:33PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> At PGConf.dev this year we had an unconference session [1] on whether
> the community can support an additional batch executor. The discussion
> there led me to start hacking on $subject. I have also had off-list
> discussions on this
12 matches
Mail list logo
