On Thu., 21 Jun. 2018, 04:30 Tom Lane, wrote:
> Ashwin Agrawal writes:
> > Okay just bouncing another approach, how about generating UUID for a
> > postgres instance during initdb and pg_basebackup ?
>
> There's no uuid generation code in core postgres, for excellent reasons
> (lack of portabili
Ashwin Agrawal writes:
> Okay just bouncing another approach, how about generating UUID for a
> postgres instance during initdb and pg_basebackup ?
There's no uuid generation code in core postgres, for excellent reasons
(lack of portability and lack of failure modes are the main objections).
This
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:50 AM Andres Freund wrote:
>
>
> On June 20, 2018 10:31:05 AM PDT, Ashwin Agrawal
> wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:39 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:17:23PM -0700, Ashwin Agrawal wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:33 AM, T
On June 20, 2018 10:31:05 AM PDT, Ashwin Agrawal wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:39 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:17:23PM -0700, Ashwin Agrawal wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Tom Lane
>wrote:
>> >
>> > Ashwin Agrawal writes:
>> > > Propo
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:39 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:17:23PM -0700, Ashwin Agrawal wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Ashwin Agrawal writes:
> > > Proposing to create directory with timestamp at time of creating
> > t
Hi,
Hi,
On 2018-05-26 10:08:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Not sure about the relative-path idea. Seems like that would create
> a huge temptation to put tablespaces inside the data directory, which
> would force us to deal with that can of worms.
It doesn't seem impossible to normalize the path,
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:17:23PM -0700, Ashwin Agrawal wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Ashwin Agrawal writes:
> > Proposing to create directory with timestamp at time of creating
> tablespace
> > and create symbolic link to it instead.
>
>
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 7:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro writes:
> > I also wondered about this when trying to figure out how to write a
> > TAP test for recovery testing with tablespaces, for my undo proposal.
> > I was starting to wonder about either allowing relative paths or
> > suppo
Thomas Munro writes:
> I also wondered about this when trying to figure out how to write a
> TAP test for recovery testing with tablespaces, for my undo proposal.
> I was starting to wonder about either allowing relative paths or
> supporting some kind of variable in the tablespace path that could
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 02:10:52PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I also wondered about this when trying to figure out how to write a
> TAP test for recovery testing with tablespaces, for my undo proposal.
> I was starting to wonder about either allowing relative paths or
> supporting some kind of va
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Ashwin Agrawal wrote:
> To generate uniqueness for the path between primary and standby need to use
> something which is not represented within database. So will be random to
> some degree. Like one can use PORT number of postmaster. As only need to
> generate uniq
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ashwin Agrawal writes:
> > Proposing to create directory with timestamp at time of creating
> tablespace
> > and create symbolic link to it instead.
>
> I'm skeptical that this solves your problem. What happens when the CREATE
> TABLESPACE comm
Ashwin Agrawal writes:
> Proposing to create directory with timestamp at time of creating tablespace
> and create symbolic link to it instead.
I'm skeptical that this solves your problem. What happens when the CREATE
TABLESPACE command is replicated to the standby with sub-second delay?
Clock sk
13 matches
Mail list logo
