I wrote:
> I'm fairly sure that in the past we've considered this idea and rejected
> it, mainly on the grounds that it's a completely gratuitous departure
> from SQL standard.
After some more digging I found the thread that (I think) the "mere
pedantry" comment was referring to:
https://www.post
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:26:47PM +0200, Laetitia Avrot wrote:
>> You will find enclosed a patch proposal to allow count to be used without a
>> star. I, on purpose, decided not to document this behavior, maybe that's
>> wrong.
> This originates from 108fe47, most likel
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:26:47PM +0200, Laetitia Avrot wrote:
> You will find enclosed a patch proposal to allow count to be used without a
> star. I, on purpose, decided not to document this behavior, maybe that's
> wrong.
This originates from 108fe47, most likely as part of this thread. The
p
