On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 23:22, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
>
> I'm not sure that expecting the relcache entry's refcount drops to zero
> at the right time is a good approach; that may cause leaks some other
> place might have refcounts you're not expecting (say, an open cursor
> that's not fully read).
Hi Ashutosh,
On 2020-Jun-22, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> I couldn't find code where this can happen but I don't see any code which
> prevents this. This looks like a recipe for memory and reference leaks.
>
> We could fix this by
> 1. Make ExecOpenIndices and ExecCloseIndices so that they can be cal
