On 2023-Nov-14, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I suppose we could also supply a set of macros with the numbers that
> map straight onto the numberless ones, with a note that they will be
> deleted after N releases.
Maybe just keep compatibility ones with 1 and 2 arguments (the ones most
used) forever, or
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 8:19 PM Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 31.03.23 04:16, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > From the light relief department, here is some more variadic macrology:
> >
> > - tp = SearchSysCache1(TSPARSEROID, ObjectIdGetDatum(prsId));
> > + tp = SearchSysCache(TSPARSEROID, Obj
On 31.03.23 04:16, Thomas Munro wrote:
From the light relief department, here is some more variadic macrology:
- tp = SearchSysCache1(TSPARSEROID, ObjectIdGetDatum(prsId));
+ tp = SearchSysCache(TSPARSEROID, ObjectIdGetDatum(prsId));
I'm worried that if we are removing the variant
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 5:36 AM Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> This looks like a good improvement to me.
Thanks both. Pushed.
> (I have also thought about having this generated from the catalog
> definition files somehow, but one step at a time ...)
Good plan.
Nikita Malakhov writes:
> Wanted to ask this since I encountered a need for a cache with 5 keys -
> why is the syscache index still limited to 4 keys?
Because there are no cases requiring 5, so far.
(A unique index with as many as 5 keys seems a bit fishy btw.)
regards,
Hi!
Wanted to ask this since I encountered a need for a cache with 5 keys -
why is the syscache index still limited to 4 keys?
Thanks!
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 7:36 PM Peter Eisentraut <
peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 21.12.22 04:16, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 a
On 21.12.22 04:16, Thomas Munro wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:33 PM Thomas Munro wrote:
KEY(Anum_pg_attribute_attrelid,
Anum_pg_attribute_attnum),
I independently rediscovered that our VA_ARGS_NARGS() macro in c.h
always returns 1 on MSVC via trial-by-CI. Derp. Here
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:33 PM Thomas Munro wrote:
> KEY(Anum_pg_attribute_attrelid,
> Anum_pg_attribute_attnum),
I independently rediscovered that our VA_ARGS_NARGS() macro in c.h
always returns 1 on MSVC via trial-by-CI. Derp. Here is the same
patch, no change from v2, bu
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 12:05 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro writes:
> > Do you think this is better?
>
> I'm not at all on board with adding runtime overhead to
> save maintaining the nkeys fields.
I don't see how to do it at compile time without getting the
preprocessor involved. What do y
Thomas Munro writes:
> Do you think this is better?
I'm not at all on board with adding runtime overhead to
save maintaining the nkeys fields.
Getting rid of the useless trailing zeroes in the key[] arrays
is clearly a win, though.
I'm kind of neutral on using "[N] = " as a substitute for
order
10 matches
Mail list logo
