On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 16:13, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I wonder if we wouldn't be better advised to require exactly one dot.
> This isn't a feature that we really encourage users to use, and the
> further we move the goalposts for it, the harder it will be to replace
> it. In particular I doubt the l
Alexander Kukushkin writes:
> At the moment the only requirement for custom parameter names is that they
> should have one or more dots.
> ...
> But, Postgres fails to start if such parameters are set in the
> configuration file with the following error:
Hmm.
> In my opinion it would be fair to
