On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 08:16:46PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Yeah, I don't see why we need to document it three times in the same
> chapter.
>
> Also, that chapter is specifically about version 3.0 of the protocol, so
> documenting version 2.0 is out of scope.
This has been marked as retur
On 25/09/2018 13:55, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:51 AM Bradley DeJong wrote:
>>
>> On 2018-09-22, Amit Kapila wrote ...
>> > ... duplicate the same information in different words at three
>> different places ...
>>
>> I count 7 different places. In the protocol docs, there is t
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 3:54 PM Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
> >> Hello Bradley & Tatsuo-san,
> >>
> ... references to the protocol version lacks homogeneity.
> ... I'd suggest to keep "the vX.0 protocol" for a short version,
> and "the version X.0 protocol" for long ...
> >>>
> >>> I agre
>> Hello Bradley & Tatsuo-san,
>>
... references to the protocol version lacks homogeneity.
... I'd suggest to keep "the vX.0 protocol" for a short version,
and "the version X.0 protocol" for long ...
>>>
>>> I agree. Change made.
>>
>> Patch applies cleanly. Doc build ok.
>>
>> O
> Hello Bradley & Tatsuo-san,
>
>>> ... references to the protocol version lacks homogeneity.
>>> ... I'd suggest to keep "the vX.0 protocol" for a short version,
>>> and "the version X.0 protocol" for long ...
>>
>> I agree. Change made.
>
> Patch applies cleanly. Doc build ok.
>
> One part tal
> Hello Bradley & Tatsuo-san,
>
> My 0.02€ on the text:
>
>> Version 2.0 of the PostgreSQL protocol
>> In the v3.0 protocol,
>> the 3.0 protocol
>> version 3.0 of the copy-in/copy-out sub-protocol
>> the V2.0 protocol.
>
> While reading nice English (I learned "holdover"), it occurs to me
> that
> On 2018-08-25, Tatsuo Ishii wrote to the pgsql-docs mailing list ...
>> Hi Bradley,
>> Thank you for your follow up. Your patch looks good to me.
>> Can you please re-send your message in pgsql-hackers attaching to this
>> thread ...
>> CommitFest app does not allow ... emails other than posted t
Hello Tatsuo-san,
Minor suggestions, although I'm not a native English speaker.
Well, I did not intend to enhance libpq.sgml but maybe your points is
valid (I cannot judge because I am not an native English speaker).
Argh, sorry, I did not read the right part:-(
The note looks good to me
Hi Fabien,
Thank you for the comment.
> Hello Tatsuo-san,
>
> Minor suggestions, although I'm not a native English speaker.
>
>> In libpq.sgml following is stated:
>>
>>Before PostgreSQL protocol 3.0, it was
>>necessary
>>for the application to explicitly send the two ch
Hello Tatsuo-san,
Minor suggestions, although I'm not a native English speaker.
In libpq.sgml following is stated:
Before PostgreSQL protocol 3.0, it was
necessary
for the application to explicitly send the two characters
\. as a final line to indicate to the server tha
10 matches
Mail list logo
