Michael Paquier writes:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:59:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, but it needs some adjustments. I'll go fix what I checked.
> c992dca2 did not change anything about ldap packages. Are the ones
> listed for RHEL and FreeBSD correct?
No, that patch was more-or-less-unre
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:59:04PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:59:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:45:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> I was a bit disturbed that you'd push information that was "just guessed",
> >
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:06:52AM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I think he used Brew paths?
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/0a7646b1-f6f6-1364-f0e3-814aed302db4%402ndquadrant.com
Yes, stuff in /usr/local/ involves homebrew.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:59:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:45:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I was a bit disturbed that you'd push information that was "just guessed",
>>> so I went and tried to run the ldap tests on a couple different platform
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> FreeBSD 12: you need openldap-client (NOT openldap24-client) to build
> with --with-ldap at all. Then also openldap-server to run this test.
Well, it's "pkg install openldap-client" but it's
"net/openldap24-client" if you're building ports from
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:45:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I was a bit disturbed that you'd push information that was "just guessed",
>> so I went and tried to run the ldap tests on a couple different platforms.
> I assumed they were guessed at and at least the URLs chec
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:45:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I was a bit disturbed that you'd push information that was "just guessed",
> so I went and tried to run the ldap tests on a couple different platforms.
I assumed they were guessed at and at least the URLs checked out.
Should we remove th
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:34:25AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> The kerberos test suite mentions the package list to use on a set of
>> distributions, which is very useful. However we don't do the same for
>> ldap. Something like the attached would be adapted then to
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:34:25AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The kerberos test suite mentions the package list to use on a set of
> distributions, which is very useful. However we don't do the same for
> ldap. Something like the attached would be adapted then to help setting
>
