[ blast-from-the-past department ]
Craig Ringer writes:
> On 5 December 2017 at 22:49, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Mark assorted variables PGDLLIMPORT.
> I was going to pipe up here to add ReplicationSlotCtl to the list.
> Otherwise the only way to access slot information is via the SPI and
> pg_
On 5 December 2017 at 22:49, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> Committed with these additions. Please check that I haven't messed
> anything up.
>
>
Looks good to me.
For the record the commit is
commit c572599c65bfe0387563233faabecd2845073538
Author: Robert Haas
Date: Tue Dec 5 09:23:57 2017 -0500
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> Committed with these additions. Please check that I haven't messed anything
>> up.
>
> Thanks, but you modified RecentGlobalDataXmin, not RecentGlobalXmin.
> Can you fix it, please?
I was looking at the wrong branch. Forget it.
Thanks
-
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> RecentGlobalXmin -- This is only PGDLLIMPORT on Postgres 10+,
>> following commit 56018bf2. I'd like to get that back to 9.4, although
>> there is no reason to not include 9.3.
>>
>> TransactionXmin -- This is needed for the newer heap-matches-
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
>>> I don't think we quite have an established protocol for this. I
>>> personally, but I'm biased in this specific case, is that we should
>>> adopt a position that PGDLLIMPORTs should basi
.
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
>> I don't think we quite have an established protocol for this. I
>> personally, but I'm biased in this specific case, is that we should
>> adopt a position that PGDLLIMPORTs should basically backpatched whenever
>> a credible extension even hal
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:02:30PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-11-20 11:58:44 -0800, Brian Cloutier wrote:
> > > please, append session_timezone to your list
> >
> > Here's a v2 patch which also includes session_timezone.
> >
> > Separately, is this the kind of thing which is eligible f
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Brian Cloutier wrote:
> Sorry, I'm new to pg-hackers, so I'm not sure what the next step is.
>
> Do I submit this to commitfest?
>
> When submitting, do I submit multiple changes, one per branch this should be
> packported to?
If you want a patch to get reviewed,
Sorry, I'm new to pg-hackers, so I'm not sure what the next step is.
Do I submit this to commitfest?
When submitting, do I submit multiple changes, one per branch this should
be packported to?
On 21 November 2017 at 04:02, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please quote properly on postgres mailing lists... We're old school [tm].
>
> On 2017-11-20 11:58:44 -0800, Brian Cloutier wrote:
> > > please, append session_timezone to your list
> >
> > Here's a v2 patch which also includes session_t
Hi,
Please quote properly on postgres mailing lists... We're old school [tm].
On 2017-11-20 11:58:44 -0800, Brian Cloutier wrote:
> > please, append session_timezone to your list
>
> Here's a v2 patch which also includes session_timezone.
>
> Separately, is this the kind of thing which is eligi
> please, append session_timezone to your list
Here's a v2 patch which also includes session_timezone.
Separately, is this the kind of thing which is eligible for backporting
into the next releases of 9.6 and 10?
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Pavel Stehule
wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2017-11-16 23:59
Hi
2017-11-16 23:59 GMT+01:00 Brian Cloutier :
> Hello hackers,
>
> I'm porting Citus to Windows and found that we use some variables which PG
> doesn't export; here is a patch which adds PGDLLIMPORT declarations to
> those variables. This is unfortunately required on Windows for extensions
> to
13 matches
Mail list logo
