On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:54 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Andy Fan writes:
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 9:40 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> >> What exactly would be the value of that?
> >> ...
>
> > I agree with this, but I don't think there is no value in my suggestion
> > unless I missed something. Per my curr
Andy Fan writes:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 9:40 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>> What exactly would be the value of that?
>> ...
> I agree with this, but I don't think there is no value in my suggestion
> unless I missed something. Per my current understanding, the code
> is too easy to make the datadir in
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 9:40 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Andy Fan writes:
> > What I mean here is something like below.
>
> What exactly would be the value of that?
>
> There is work afoot, or at least on people's to-do lists, to mechanize
> creation of the outfuncs/readfuncs/etc code directly from the
Andy Fan writes:
> What I mean here is something like below.
What exactly would be the value of that?
There is work afoot, or at least on people's to-do lists, to mechanize
creation of the outfuncs/readfuncs/etc code directly from the Node
struct declarations. So special cases for particular fi
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 8:10 AM Andy Fan wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:11 PM Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
>
>> On 2020-Nov-24, Andy Fan wrote:
>>
>> > then we modified the copy/read/out functions for this node. In
>> > _readFuncExpr,
>> > we probably add something like
>>
>> > [ ... ]
>>
>
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:11 PM Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> On 2020-Nov-24, Andy Fan wrote:
>
> > then we modified the copy/read/out functions for this node. In
> > _readFuncExpr,
> > we probably add something like
>
> > [ ... ]
>
> > Then we will get a compatible issue if we create a view with the
On 2020-Nov-24, Andy Fan wrote:
> then we modified the copy/read/out functions for this node. In
> _readFuncExpr,
> we probably add something like
> [ ... ]
> Then we will get a compatible issue if we create a view with the node in
> the older version and access the view with the new binary.
W
