Re: [patch] [doc] Clarify that signal functions have no feedback

2020-11-18 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 17/11/2020 21:50, David G. Johnston wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 6:13 AM Heikki Linnakangas > wrote: You can use the pg_file_settings and pg_hba_file_rules views to check the configuration files for possible errors, before reloading. I agree with adding

Re: [patch] [doc] Clarify that signal functions have no feedback

2020-11-17 Thread David G. Johnston
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 6:13 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 02/11/2020 18:02, David G. Johnston wrote: > > diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml > > index bf6004f321..43bc2cf086 100644 > > --- a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml > > +++ b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml > > @@ -23892,7 +238

Re: [patch] [doc] Clarify that signal functions have no feedback

2020-11-17 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 02/11/2020 18:02, David G. Johnston wrote: diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml index bf6004f321..43bc2cf086 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml @@ -23892,7 +23892,8 @@ SELECT collation for ('foo' COLLATE "de_DE"); The functions

Re: [patch] [doc] Clarify that signal functions have no feedback

2020-11-02 Thread David G. Johnston
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 1:19 AM Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2020-10-13 00:43, David G. Johnston wrote: > > Over in Bug# 16652 [1] Christoph failed to recognize the fact that > > signal sending functions are inherently one-way just as signals are. It > > seems

Re: [patch] [doc] Clarify that signal functions have no feedback

2020-10-27 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2020-10-13 00:43, David G. Johnston wrote: Over in Bug# 16652 [1] Christoph failed to recognize the fact that signal sending functions are inherently one-way just as signals are.  It seems worth heading off this situation in the future by making it clear how signals behave and, in the specif