On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 4:39 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-08-11 15:06:44 -0500, Marcelo Juchem wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 2:53 PM Andres Freund
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 2023-08-11 13:43:17 -0500, Marcelo Juchem wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure I know a good way to cl
In my case, my product has a very controlled environment.
We build all our infrastructure from source and we avoid dynamic linking by
design, except where technically not viable (e.g.: pgsql extensions).
LLVM is one of the libraries we're specifically required to statically link.
Unfortunately I c
Andres, Tom, I found your names in the git history for JIT and LLVM.
Any chance one of you could take a look at the patch?
-mj
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 2:45 PM Marcelo Juchem wrote:
> By default, PostgreSQL doesn't explicitly choose whether to link
> statically or dynamically against LLVM when
Hi,
On 2023-08-11 12:59:27 -0500, Marcelo Juchem wrote:
> In my case, my product has a very controlled environment.
> We build all our infrastructure from source and we avoid dynamic linking by
> design, except where technically not viable (e.g.: pgsql extensions).
>
> LLVM is one of the librarie
Hi,
On 2023-08-10 14:45:47 -0500, Marcelo Juchem wrote:
> By default, PostgreSQL doesn't explicitly choose whether to link
> statically or dynamically against LLVM when LLVM JIT is enabled (e.g.:
> `./configure --with-llvm`).
>
> `llvm-config` will choose to dynamically link by default.
>
> In o
