Committed.
--
nathan
Here is what I have staged for commit. The only differences from v1 are
some very light edits.
--
nathan
>From aa0cc332c6fbadfa6f49ab072dd97c5c8d78fdf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Bossart
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:01:32 -0500
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] Add reverse() for bytea.
This comm
Nathan, Daniel,
> > We already have array_reverse() and text_reverse(), so I see no strong
> > reason against also having a bytea_reverse().
>
> +1
I also considered adding reverse(bit) however to my knowledge there is
no practical usage for it.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:40:01AM +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> The proposed patch adds reverse(bytea) function.
We already have array_reverse() and text_reverse(), so I see no strong
reason against also having a bytea_reverse().
--
nathan
> On 10 Mar 2025, at 22:06, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:40:01AM +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
>> The proposed patch adds reverse(bytea) function.
>
> We already have array_reverse() and text_reverse(), so I see no strong
> reason against also having a bytea_reverse()