Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> writes:
> Oh, ok - I see now, thank you. So, I think no one would object if I'll mark
> this patch as ready for committer.
Pushed, thanks for reviewing!
regards, tom lane
> On 2 January 2018 at 20:52, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I did find one case where the patch makes things significantly slower:
>
> select * from test where true is true
> and true is true
> and true is true
> and true is true
> ... (100 times altogether)
Yes, indeed, I never tested this kind of con
Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> writes:
> I tried to experiment a bit with this patch, hope it may be helpful.
Thanks for reviewing!
I took your idea of just running pgbench results, and adapted it to these
test cases:
select * from test where 1 = 1 or 1 = 2;
select * from test where 1 =
> On 12 September 2017 at 15:29, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> This patch no longer applies cleanly on HEAD, so here's a rebased version
> (no substantive changes). As before, I think the most useful review task
> would be to quantify whether it makes planning noticeably slower.
I tried to experiment a bi
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> This patch no longer applies cleanly on HEAD, so here's a rebased version
>> (no substantive changes). As before, I think the most useful review task
>> would be to quantify whether it makes planning noticeably slower.
>
> Rebased agai
