Mmm..
At Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:57:19 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote in
> So, somehow we need to complete the KnownAssignedTransactionIds even
> if there's any subxid-overflown transactions. As mentioned upthread,
> I think we have at least the following choices.
>
> - Send back the complet
At Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:37:52 +0800 (CST), Thunder wrote in
> Thanks for replay.I feel confused about snapshot.
>
> At 2019-10-23 11:51:19, "Kyotaro Horiguchi" wrote:
> >Hello.
> >
> >At Tue, 22 Oct 2019 20:42:21 +0800 (CST), Thunder wrote
> >in
> >> Update the patch.
> >>
> >> 1. The STAN
At Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:51:19 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote in
> Hello.
>
> At Tue, 22 Oct 2019 20:42:21 +0800 (CST), Thunder wrote
> in
> > Update the patch.
> >
> > 1. The STANDBY_SNAPSHOT_PENDING state is set when we replay the first
> > XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS and the sub transaction
Hello.
At Tue, 22 Oct 2019 20:42:21 +0800 (CST), Thunder wrote in
> Update the patch.
>
> 1. The STANDBY_SNAPSHOT_PENDING state is set when we replay the first
> XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS and the sub transaction ids are overflow.
> 2. When we log XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS in master node, can we assume that
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 4:13 AM Thunder wrote:
> Can we fix this issue like the following patch?
>
> $git diff src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
> diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
> b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
> index 49ae97d4459..0fbdf6fd64a 100644
> --- a/src/backend/acces
Can we fix this issue like the following patch?
$git diff src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index 49ae97d4459..0fbdf6fd64a 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@
