Re: [BUG] pg_dump blocked

2022-11-19 Thread Tom Lane
Gilles Darold writes: > Le 17/11/2022 à 17:59, Tom Lane a écrit : >> I didn't want to back-patch e3fcbbd62 at the time, but it's probably aged >> long enough now to be safe to back-patch. If we do anything here, >> it should be to back-patch the whole thing, else we've only partially >> fixed the

Re: [BUG] pg_dump blocked

2022-11-18 Thread Gilles Darold
Le 17/11/2022 à 17:59, Tom Lane a écrit : Gilles Darold writes: I have an incorrect behavior with pg_dump prior PG version 15. With PostgreSQL 15, thanks to commit e3fcbbd623b9ccc16cdbda374654d91a4727d173 the problem is gone but for older versions it persists with locks on partitioned tables.

Re: [BUG] pg_dump blocked

2022-11-17 Thread Gilles Darold
Le 17/11/2022 à 17:59, Tom Lane a écrit : Gilles Darold writes: I have an incorrect behavior with pg_dump prior PG version 15. With PostgreSQL 15, thanks to commit e3fcbbd623b9ccc16cdbda374654d91a4727d173 the problem is gone but for older versions it persists with locks on partitioned tables.

Re: [BUG] pg_dump blocked

2022-11-17 Thread Tom Lane
Gilles Darold writes: > I have an incorrect behavior with pg_dump prior PG version 15. With > PostgreSQL 15, thanks to commit e3fcbbd623b9ccc16cdbda374654d91a4727d173 > the problem is gone but for older versions it persists with locks on > partitioned tables. I didn't want to back-patch e3fcbb