Dear Ashutosh,
Thanks for the confirmation!
> This looks good to me. It builds with meson. Didn't check make.
I confirmed it could be built via make command.
> > Hmm, unify the treatment seems clean, but it may break current connection
> rules
> > for some application. I'm not sure now this is
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 2:25 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> Dear Ashutosh,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> > > ISTM the inconsistency is introduced since the initial commit. I think
> > > they should
> > be unified either
> > > 1) update the doc or 2) accept when -d is not specified. Persona
Dear Ashutosh,
Thanks for the reply.
> > ISTM the inconsistency is introduced since the initial commit. I think they
> > should
> be unified either
> > 1) update the doc or 2) accept when -d is not specified. Personally, I like
> > 2nd
> approach, pg_recvlogical
> > can follow the normal connec
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 9:56 AM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> Dear hackers,
>
> Hi, I found the issue $SUBJECT. According to the doc [1]:
>
> ```
> -d dbname
> --dbname=dbname
> The database to connect to. See the description of the actions for what this
> means in detail.
> The dbname can b
