RE: doc patch: wrong descriptions for dropping replication slots

2025-04-04 Thread Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
Dear Fujii-san, > Unless there are any objections, I plan to push your patch with > the following commit message and back-patch it to all supported versions. ... Thanks for updating the commit message. LGTM. Best regards, Hayato Kuroda FUJITSU LIMITED

Re: doc patch: wrong descriptions for dropping replication slots

2025-03-23 Thread Fujii Masao
On 2025/03/21 10:07, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote: Dear Fujii-san, Unless there are any objections, I plan to push your patch with the following commit message and back-patch it to all supported versions. ... Thanks for updating the commit message. LGTM. I've committed the patch with th

Re: doc patch: wrong descriptions for dropping replication slots

2025-03-19 Thread Fujii Masao
On 2025/03/19 11:07, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote: Dear Fujii-san, Why was this restriction removed? If there was a past discussion about it, could you share the details? More properly, pg_drop_replication_slot() has been introduced since PG9.4, and old documents did not have the descrip

RE: doc patch: wrong descriptions for dropping replication slots

2025-03-18 Thread Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
Dear Fujii-san, > Why was this restriction removed? If there was a past discussion about it, > could you share the details? More properly, pg_drop_replication_slot() has been introduced since PG9.4, and old documents did not have the description. The description has been added while developing P

Re: doc patch: wrong descriptions for dropping replication slots

2025-03-18 Thread Fujii Masao
On 2025/03/18 17:46, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote: Dear hackers, While considering another thread, I found the $SUBJECT. Attached patch fixes it. Thanks for the patch! Documentation says: ``` pg_drop_replication_slot ( slot_name name ) → void Drops the physical or logical replication