Dear Michael,
> Thanks, I've applied some slight tweaks, and applied the result down
> to v17, leaving the heap_update point alone.
Thanks, I confirmed your commit on HEAD and LGTM.
Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 12:10:51PM +, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> Thanks for suggesting them. ISTM, you are correct. PSA updated version.
Thanks, I've applied some slight tweaks, and applied the result down
to v17, leaving the heap_update point alone.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Descriptio
Dear Michael,
> > I also feel just converting lower case is not good. The point seems to
> > locate in
> > the end-of-transaction callback and it accepts invalidation messages. Based
> > on
> the
> > fact, how about "inval-process-invalidation-messages"?
> > 0002 did simple replacements of these
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 12:36:20PM +, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> I also feel just converting lower case is not good. The point seems to locate
> in
> the end-of-transaction callback and it accepts invalidation messages. Based
> on the
> fact, how about "inval-process-invalidation-messag
Dear Aleksander,
> ```
> - their own code using the same macro.
> + their own code using the same macro. The name of injection points must
> be
> + lower characters, and dashes must separate its terms.
> ```
>
> Perhaps "must" is a too strong statement. I suggest something like:
>
Hi,
> Naming rule of points is not determined yet, but most of them have lower cases
> and each term are divided by dash "-". I think this is a good chance to
> formally
> clarify it. PSA adding the description.
>
> I was confused the correct place for the description. I added at the end of
> fi
