Re: Update comments in multixact.c

2023-01-24 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 2:02 AM shiy.f...@fujitsu.com wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > > Attach a patch which fixed them. Pushed something close to that just now. I decided that it was better to not specify when truncation happened in these two places at all, though. The important detail is that

RE: Update comments in multixact.c

2023-01-18 Thread shiy.f...@fujitsu.com
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 6:04 AM Peter Geoghegan wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:33 AM shiy.f...@fujitsu.com > wrote: > > I noticed that commit 5212d447fa updated some comments in multixact.c > because > > SLRU truncation for multixacts is performed during VACUUM, instead of > > checkpoint. Sho

Re: Update comments in multixact.c

2023-01-17 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:33 AM shiy.f...@fujitsu.com wrote: > I noticed that commit 5212d447fa updated some comments in multixact.c because > SLRU truncation for multixacts is performed during VACUUM, instead of > checkpoint. Should the following comments which mentioned checkpointer be > changed