On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 2:02 AM shiy.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> Attach a patch which fixed them.
Pushed something close to that just now. I decided that it was better
to not specify when truncation happened in these two places at all,
though. The important detail is that
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 6:04 AM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:33 AM shiy.f...@fujitsu.com
> wrote:
> > I noticed that commit 5212d447fa updated some comments in multixact.c
> because
> > SLRU truncation for multixacts is performed during VACUUM, instead of
> > checkpoint. Sho
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:33 AM shiy.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
> I noticed that commit 5212d447fa updated some comments in multixact.c because
> SLRU truncation for multixacts is performed during VACUUM, instead of
> checkpoint. Should the following comments which mentioned checkpointer be
> changed