On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 03:25:19PM -0700, Michael Paquier wrote:
> If anybody objects about the points getting renamed here, please let
> me know.
Applied this one as 114f7fa81c72.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:14:59AM +, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
>> Anyway, would you like to propose a patch for the documentation?
>
> Sure, I did. Please see [1].
>
> [1]:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/OSCPR01MB14966E14C1378DEE51FB7B7C5F5B32%40OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.ou
Dear Michael,
> > I have no objections for the patch, but I feel there are no concrete naming
> > rules
> > (I confused while creating patches).
>
> There has been a sort of implied rule in the code to use lower
> characters, with terms separated by dashes. Perhaps we could make
> that more off
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 08:13:44AM +, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> I have no objections for the patch, but I feel there are no concrete naming
> rules
> (I confused while creating patches).
There has been a sort of implied rule in the code to use lower
characters, with terms separated by
Dear Michael,
> 93bc3d75d8e1 has introduced a couple of new injection points, but
> these don't follow the convention in-place where points are named
> more-or-less-like-that. Please find attached a patch to make all
> these more consistent.
I have no objections for the patch, but I feel there a
