On Wednesday, September 15, 2021 6:54 PM, Daniel Gustafsson
wrote:
>The proposal removes a second == NULL check on field_name in the case where
>OBJ_nid2sn() returns an ASN1_OBJECT. This is not in a hot path, and the ASM
>generated is equal under optimization levels so I don't see the value in t
> On 15 Sep 2021, at 10:06, tanghy.f...@fujitsu.com wrote:
> Attached a small fix to remove double check when field_name is not NULL in
> be-secure-openssl.c.
> The double check is introduced in 13cfa02f7 for "Improve error handling in
> backend OpenSSL implementation".
The proposal removes a s