On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 16:20, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 7:01 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, April 24, 2024 6:29 PM vignesh C wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > The attached patch
> > > v7-0001-Table-sync-missed-due-to-race-condition-in-subscr.patch
> > > applie
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 15:49, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 4:53 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 11:59 AM vignesh C wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 10:12, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > For 0002, instead of avoid resett
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 7:01 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, April 24, 2024 6:29 PM vignesh C wrote:
> >
> >
> > The attached patch
> > v7-0001-Table-sync-missed-due-to-race-condition-in-subscr.patch
> > applies for master and PG16 branch,
> > v7-0001-Table-sync-missed-due-to-rac
On Wednesday, April 24, 2024 6:29 PM vignesh C wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 11:59, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 9:19 AM vignesh C wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 09:34, Ajin Cherian wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 2:59 PM vign
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 11:59, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 9:19 AM vignesh C wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 09:34, Ajin Cherian wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 2:59 PM vignesh C wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks, I have created the following Comm
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 4:53 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 11:59 AM vignesh C wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 10:12, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > For 0002, instead of avoid resetting the latch, is it possible to let the
> > > logical rep worker wake
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 9:19 AM vignesh C wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 09:34, Ajin Cherian wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 2:59 PM vignesh C wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks, I have created the following Commitfest entry for this:
> >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/47/4816/
>
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 11:59 AM vignesh C wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 10:12, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > For 0002, instead of avoid resetting the latch, is it possible to let the
> > logical rep worker wake up the launcher once after attaching ?
>
> Waking up of the launch pr
On Wednesday, March 13, 2024 11:49 AM vignesh C wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 09:34, Ajin Cherian wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 2:59 PM vignesh C wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks, I have created the following Commitfest entry for this:
> >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/47/
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 10:12, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, March 13, 2024 11:49 AMvignesh C wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 09:34, Ajin Cherian wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 2:59 PM vignesh C wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks, I have created the foll
On Wednesday, March 13, 2024 11:49 AMvignesh C wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 09:34, Ajin Cherian wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 2:59 PM vignesh C wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks, I have created the following Commitfest entry for this:
> >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/47/4816
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 09:34, Ajin Cherian wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 2:59 PM vignesh C wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thanks, I have created the following Commitfest entry for this:
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/47/4816/
>>
>> Regards,
>> Vignesh
>
>
> Thanks for the patch, I have verified t
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 2:59 PM vignesh C wrote:
>
> Thanks, I have created the following Commitfest entry for this:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/47/4816/
>
> Regards,
> Vignesh
>
Thanks for the patch, I have verified that the fix works well by following
the steps mentioned to reproduce t
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 at 23:30, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>
> 08.02.2024 12:25, vignesh C wrote:
> > Yes, the wakeup call sent by the "CREATE SUBSCRIPTION" command was
> > getting missed in this case. The wakeup call can be sent during
> > subscription creation/modification and when the apply worker ex
08.02.2024 12:25, vignesh C wrote:
Yes, the wakeup call sent by the "CREATE SUBSCRIPTION" command was
getting missed in this case. The wakeup call can be sent during
subscription creation/modification and when the apply worker exits.
WaitForReplicationWorkerAttach should not reset the latch here
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 at 18:30, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>
> 05.02.2024 13:13, vignesh C wrote:
> > Thanks for the steps for the issue, I was able to reproduce this issue
> > in my environment with the steps provided. The attached patch has a
> > proposed fix where the latch will not be set in case of
05.02.2024 13:13, vignesh C wrote:
Thanks for the steps for the issue, I was able to reproduce this issue
in my environment with the steps provided. The attached patch has a
proposed fix where the latch will not be set in case of the apply
worker exiting immediately after starting.
It looks lik
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 11:30, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>
> Hello Vignesh and Hou-san,
>
> 01.02.2024 07:59, vignesh C wrote:
> > Here is an updated patch which changes the boolean variable to a
> > tri-state enum and set stable state to valid only if no invalidations
> > have been occurred while the
Hello Vignesh and Hou-san,
01.02.2024 07:59, vignesh C wrote:
Here is an updated patch which changes the boolean variable to a
tri-state enum and set stable state to valid only if no invalidations
have been occurred while the list is being prepared.
While testing the v3 patch, I observed anot
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 17:22, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, January 30, 2024 11:21 AM vignesh C wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 07:24, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Monday, January 29, 2024 9:22 PM vignesh C
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at
On Tuesday, January 30, 2024 11:21 AM vignesh C wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 07:24, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, January 29, 2024 9:22 PM vignesh C
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 11:30, Alexander Lakhin
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello hackers,
> > > >
> > >
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 07:24, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> On Monday, January 29, 2024 9:22 PM vignesh C wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 11:30, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello hackers,
> > >
> > > After determining a possible cause for intermittent failures of the
> > > test s
On Monday, January 29, 2024 9:22 PM vignesh C wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 11:30, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> >
> > Hello hackers,
> >
> > After determining a possible cause for intermittent failures of the
> > test subscription/031_column_list [1], I was wondering what makes
> > another subs
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 11:30, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>
> Hello hackers,
>
> After determining a possible cause for intermittent failures of the test
> subscription/031_column_list [1], I was wondering what makes another
> subscription test (014_binary) fail on the buildfarm:
> https://buildfarm.p
24 matches
Mail list logo